The only reason I would ever shoot film again would be to hear the shutter from my Hassleblad or better yet photograph with my “older” brothers camera. Looks like I may have to take a road trip with him
The camera is a Burke and James ‘Orbitar’, circa late 1950′s
65mm f/8 Schneider Kreuznach Super- Angulon lens, same era
1 second exposure / f 22 (around there), UV filter
Adox Art 25 B&W film / Rodinal developer
photographed July 26/09 Michigan Central Station
This is a crop from the file he sent me and really it still doesn’t do justice to the pin sharp neg.
Opened in 1913, the building is of the Beaux-Arts Classical style of architecture, designed by the Warren & Wetmore and Reed and Stem firms who also designed New York City’s Grand Central Terminal. The price tag for this 500,000-square-foot (46,000 m2) building was $15 million when it was built.
The building is composed of two distinct parts: the train station itself and the 18-storey tower. The roof height is 230 feet (70 m). Ideas as to what the tower was originally designed for include a hotel, offices for the rail company, or a combination of both. In reality, the tower was only used for office space by the Michigan Central Railroad and subsequent owners of the building. The interiors of at least the top floor were completed and served no function.
The main waiting room on the main floor was modeled after an ancient Roman bathhouse with walls of marble. The building also housed a large hall adorned with Doric columns and contained the ticket office and arcade shops. Beyond the arcade was the concourse, which had brick walls and a large copper skylight. From here, passengers would walk down a ramp to the departing train platforms, 11 tracks in all. Below the tracks and building is a large area for baggage, mail, and other office building functions.
The building has been stripped of most valuable items including brass fixtures. It has also been the victim of extensive vandalism.
by Mark Ridout
3 comments
D'Arcy - Some people just don’t know what good glass is! It is the Camera and lens that ‘they’ brought to the moon if you believe that! I use mine every week…if you had one you would know.
Mark Ridout - You are correct Andreas, I do need to compare the lenses with the Canon glass when I can muster up some spare time. My initial quick playing around was not scientific in any way. What I immediately saw were images that are as sharp as my Canon 85mm. My intentions are not to work these lenses into any daily routine, just saw the adapter while surfing one afternoon and decided to piss away another fifty green backs…..it really is never ending and the Hassleblad enjoyed coming off the shelf for a few minutes. Perhaps one day when the digital backs become cheaper I’ll pull it out again. The 80mm Hassey lens is really a 122mm on the 5D as far as my calculations go and the 150mm is above 200mm when mounted.
andreas - cool conversion..but from these photos you can’t really tell what the difference is. I’m sure there is some contrast differences and sharpness…but is it really that much better? Perhaps two samples of the same shot with a canon lens too?